The Contradictor

By: Honey Rey P. Baclig

In my own understanding, based on the author Henry Tukeman in the story “The killing of the mammoth”, this story is the experience of the author on what are the strategies to the in order to gain money. As what I have criticized in this story, in this method or strategy. I am not infavor with its did’s and it’s too hilarious of what they are doing. If I’m not mistaken, I think this is the reason of the extinction of the mammoth and it’s too illegal. As what I have observed to the story, as a critical reader I observed hedging to this topic, hence it has many instances that are not sure. I am wondering that this article is true or not, thus according as what I have researched 4500 years ago the mammoth is already extinct, that is why they caught a mammoth before and they killed many mammoth? Is this story is old? Older than 4500 years? I think in that time it was no museum at all. 

They are killing mammoth and measuring the bones and exposed to the museum in order to gain money. They have many strategies in order to kill the mammoth, and I have observed also that their speaking method was weird and wrong grammar and I understand also if what they are going to imply.

Furthermore, I observed that this article was too advanced and more on technologies, I don’t think if why 4500 years ago, that stage was the homo sapiens are developing and the mammoth already extinct. Then this article it has already a museum in that time. Maybe I could also believe that they found only the specimen or fossils at this moment is, however at this article you will see that they actually killing the mammoth.

From the article, Tukeman didn’t even provide any background data profile. What is his status in life? Who really are his parents or what kind of family they are? Is he is literature or not? Is he is the authority to give trust? This ae some questions that are needed to be explain or answered so that the reader should not fascinated for this article.

Being a critical reader, when you put together your own knowledge to critique an article is really good. If I’m not mesmerized, even the date, place, and time taken in the event of the killing of the mammoth really fell confused. You just like believing a little child that he kills a herculean giant, if you also believe that he kill a herculean animal which had been said that it was extinct more than million years ago.

It’s a fictional story. Monopolizes our mind, I guess it is not the mammoth specimen he is going to sell, thus this article he wants this article to sold-out in the market sold-out in the market so that he can buy napkins or plate to his house so that her pretty wife will not get angry unto him. It’s marvelous, you drastically sell your own name, dignity or even your life just for a bunch of money.

From the article, you can give doubt to yourself if why does he make the article that in the first place he even started that he has no longer have rights in claiming that mammoth’s specimen, hence he sold it already. He didn’t have think that suspicious he made a mistake om his works is an epic fail in his whole life.

As a critical reader, I read in the other reference that this story is only a fantastic story only, and it developed by the fiction books organization. If you will read the article only without any references, you are attempting to believe to this story. Nevertheless, you are also fooling yourself believe in this false case.

He claimed the fact but it was not tested and proven, all about I read was all about the contradiction of Tukeman’s story, and it falls into a fiction story as what I have said a while ago. His way of strategies was he is making the story more fantastic so that the readers will also believe it.

It was fantastic tale. Tukeman had only seen a living mammoth but had brought it back for study. As he affirmed several times in his piece, the skeleton was now in the hands of the Smithson where it could be appreciated by some of the nation’s finest scientists. If only Tukeman’s story was true!

Well this is the proof, “Tukeman’s story was written as a work of fiction” according to the science blog. Tales of living mammoth but had popped up in newspapers here and there and Tukeman’s story was an imaginative extension of what so many reports hinted at. It had not been intended to deceive readers. But the “mammoth mania” soon deluge the magazine and the with letters concerning Tukeman’s story. As printed in a subsequent article meant to set readers straight on mammoths.

Did you ever notice that magazine was quite similar with the tale stories? Well this is a tale this story was imaginary happening only. If am going to tell you a question, do you agree with this statement? Did the story tell the truth? Specifically, this is not true at the very beginning and at the very first place even between the title of the story.

As a critical reader, as what I have read in wild life in the internet, the mammoth was extinct by only the changing of the weather and the generation today, not the killing of the mammoth. I think this is not the experience of Tukeman this only the imagination and it has a proof, if you site in the other references and I finally get the point of it.

He only wrote it for the sake of money and to amazed the readers also. Your knowledge is too short if you are not a critical reader, try to broad your mind and practicing reading between the line.